I am what most people in the United States
would describe as an idealist, a progressive, a liberal, a social democrat,
or worse. Consequently, the question that a few of my friends and I often
ask ourselves is: why bother? Let me explain. The world some of us would
like to see, and are fighting to help bring about with our actions and writings,
is one in which more people will use reason to make their decisions; fundamentalist
religion will be seen as silly at best, and profoundly misguided and dangerous
at worst; the environment will be thought of a real priority; war will not
be possible because of a truly civilized international system of police
and tribunals (you know, just like modern societies are an improvement over
the law of the jungle?); and human beings will engage not in the search
for profit or shallow consumerism but in the pursuit of true happiness and
fulfillment. Scary, eh?
Now, the world in which we actually live is apparently characterized by
rampant superstition and nonsense; fundamentalist religion is seen as a
respectable, even enviable, way of life; the environment keeps taking a
beating notwithstanding international conferences and political pledges;
wars are been fought all over the planet and more are in the planning; and
many of our societys role models are among the shallowest (movie and
sports stars) and meanest (corporate executives) people one can think of.
I repeat: why bother? I mean: in order to be a liberal freethinker one
has either to be a masochist or a hopeless optimist, completely out of
touch with reality. We are bombarded with bad news every day and from
every corner. Yes, we had eight years of Clinton, blessed be the memory
of his presidency, but he wasnt really a liberal or a progressive.
Rather, he was a fairly moderate Republican (yes, you read correctly),
and hardly slowed down the onslaught of corporate interests and environmental
catastrophe that has been the hallmark of this countrys policy since
Reagan. To make it even worse, now we have a president who was not elected
democratically (hey, I thought that happened only in Third World countries!),
who keeps showing a callous disrespect for the environment and an equally
abominable close tie to big business, and of whom (for some reason) most
people keep approving because he has character (by which they
must mean that he is able to lie about his past better than Clinton did).
All of this sounds hopeless, and no matter what my friends and I write
or do, it will likely not change perceptibly during our lifetime. Then
again, before yielding to depression and committing suicide or, worse,
going on annual pilgrimages to DisneyWorld, we should consider the idea
of different temporal horizons of activism. You see, all that I have described
so far happens at what I think of as the mid-time horizon, i.e., stretches
of time that can be measured on the order of a human life. But there are
at least two additional horizons to consider if you are as stubborn an
optimist as I am.
First, there is the near-time horizon. This is the here and now, in which
we can make a huge difference at the local level. Our doings and writings
can touch people in countless ways. Its true: I get testimonials
via email every week. Our actions can make a difference between a school
board adopting a textbook that teaches the nonsense of creationism and
another based on the best science available. This will affect thousands
of kids, immediately! True, a protest at the local nuclear plant may go
completely unnoticed; but other causes, like the No-Global movement, have
made themselves heard the world over (despite the obvious irony intrinsic
in such success
). Furthermore, things do change in major ways, from
time to time. Lets not forget that the Soviet Union and the Berlin
wall crumbled in front of our eyes after having been apparently unfaltering
symbols of oppression for decades. Equally surprisingly, Nelson Mandela
went from political prisoner to head of state in South Africa, and the
Milosovic government in the former Yugoslavia disappeared. These things
dont happen if we leave the field entirely to conservative and regressive
forces.
Then there is the long-time horizon. I know most people think history
is boring, but thats a pity, because they would find that things
do change during the course of human history and, often enough, for the
better. A few decades ago it would have been perfectly acceptable to enforce
racist laws in the United States; today this is unthinkable. Not long
before that, women were not allowed to vote, while now all political parties
consistently court them. Slavery was sanctioned in Western countries until
the 19th century, but it is now actively fought everywhere in the world.
Religious fundamentalists may have a large influence on the cultural and
political life of the United States and the Middle East, but that is a
far cry from the absolute dominance of religious bigotry that characterized
several centuries of Western history deservedly referred to as the
dark ages. And the environment wasnt even an issue until the
second half of the 20th century. These long-term changes, like the short-term
ones listed above, were made possible by the continuous action of people
who kept protesting, marching and writing to further human flourishing
in the broadest possible sense. Most of them saw no perceptible change
for the better during their life times, but they believed it would eventually
come if they kept up the struggle. They were right.
I am under no illusion that this column or anything I do will change
the world, but I do know that people are positively affected by what is
written and done in the here and now. And I know that it is because of
my friends and colleagues who keep protesting against nonsense, greed
and repression that we can conceive of a better future for humanity. Indeed,
to some extent, that future has already happened.
|

Just out! Massimo's new book, Denying Evolution: Creationism, Scientism,
and the Nature of Science, by Sinauer
Ass.
Quote of the month:
"What used to be called liberal is now called radical, what used to
be called radical is now called insane, what used to be called reactionary
is now called moderate, and what used to be called insane is now called
solid conservative thinking." -- Tony Kushner
Further readings:
Stupid
White Men... and other sorry excuses for the state of the Nation!, by
Michael Moore, an outrageous look at America from the point of view of a
radical liberal (it almost went unpublished because it was considered too
harsh to "President" Bush...).
Web links:
MedLine's
page on research on brain injuries, where you can find the latest in
this fascinating field of study..

Massimo's Tales of the Rational: Essays About Nature and Science

Visit Massimo's Skeptic & Humanist Web

Visit Massimo'sPhilosophy Page
|