Home Activities Publications Resources Login About Us Contact
Next Meeting: 1st Sunday

Join RET using PayPal

Printer Friendly


Upcoming Book Club Selections

Join Our Mailing List
Study Notes for Sunday Book Club
We are looking at Bedford McCoin's (local author's) trilogy of books on Sunday, April 18, at the Candy Factory (10:30 a.m.; Refreshments and Fellowship at 10:00 a.m.)

Attached here is a summary by Massimo Pigliucci, by subject matter, of the three books: Traditional Values Revisited, by Bedford McCoin

Traditional Values Revisited, by Bedford McCoin


- Socrates/Plato: only just people can be happy (I, 11)
- Socrates/Plato: the mixed life of pleasure and wisdom conquers all (I, 60)
- Socrates/Plato: happines requires temperance (I, 67)
- Aristotle: happines (eudaimonia) is fulfillment of function (I, 72), and the chief function of humans is contemplation (mental excellence, I, 94)
- Aristotle: the road to happiness is an end in itself (I, 73)
- Aristotle: part of the trick is to limit ourselves to what we can reasonably achieve (I, 79)
- Aristotle: friends are as importance to excellence of life as eating is to survival (I, 90)
- Aristotle: well-being emanates from having both the right goals and the right means to achieve them (I, 102)
- Lucretius: contentment doesn’t come from religious rituals, but from peace of mind (I, 149, 153)
- Epictetus: we have absolute power only over our will (I, 158, 161, 163)
- Epictetus: we must remove desires and bad opinions from our souls (I, 160, 165)
- Marcus Aurelius: we need good teachers, and we have a limited time to clear the clouds from our minds (I, 168)
- Marcus Aurelius: life is too short to waste it after fame and fortune (I, 169, 170, 174)
- Marcus Aurelius: the good of the individual and that of society are interrelated, so no selfish behavior (I, 172, 175)
- Marcus Aurelius: the real cause of our irritation is not to be found into things, but in our opinions of things (I, 172)
- Plotinus: our souls should be developed the way a sculptor develops a statue (I, 179)
- Plotinus: lasting satisfaction comes no from the pursuit of outward goals, but from the possession of the inward self (I, 187)
- Montaigne: “to philosophize is to learn to die” (II, 1)
- Montaigne: “the most manifest sign of wisdom is a continual cheerfulness” (II, 10)
- Hobbes: happiness is not a product of a satisfied mind, but the “continual progress of the desire from one object to another” (II, 35, 40)
- Spinoza: the aim of every man should be self-satisfaction through reason (II, 82)
- Locke: contentment is a form of happiness (II, 90, 97)
- Hume: friendship is one of life’s chief joys, and moderation is the source of tranquillity and happiness (II, 129,131)
- Rousseau: luxuy is perhaps the greatest of all evils (II, 136, 138)
- Mill: right actions promote happiness (III, 88, 92)
- Mill: a satisfied life is a proportional mix of tranquillity and excitement (III, 88, 93)
- Freud: happiness is a combination of pleasure and escape from pain (III, 138, 143)


- Socrates/Plato: virtue is acquired through knowledge (I, 1; but see I, 27-28)
- Aristotle: moral virtues are formed by habit (I, 75)
- Aristotle: moral virtue is the mean between two vices (I, 75)
- Aristotle:we are naturally inclined to learn morality (I, 77)
- Aristotle: practical wisdom offers the right means, moral virtue the right ends (I, 87)
- Kant: morality is a matter of rational, not divine, judgment (III, 12)
- Kant: when facing moral questions, ask yourself if a given course of action could be generalized to be a universal law (III, 18, 20, 24)
- Kant: morality is a matter of duty, not predilection (III, 26)
- Kant: the universality of moral behavior also helps us figuring out if a war is just (III, 29, 34)
- Mill: bringing a child into the world w/out prospects of care and education is a moral crime (III, 83, 87)
- Mill: morality is a natural outgrowth of human nature (III, 89, 94)


- Socrates/Plato: it is better to be wronged than to do wrong (I, 66)
- Aristotle: it is what is both lawful and fair (I, 83)
- Aristotle: there is a distinction between willfull and accidental injustice (I, 85)
- Aristotle: justice is the virtue through which everybody enjoys his own possessions in accordance with the law (I, 135)
- Montaigne: good and evil are a matter of opinion, not the basic natures of anything (II, 3) -- see also Hobbes, II 35, 39; and Spinoza (II, 83)
- Rousseau: animals should be entitled to decent treatment (II, 135)
- Rousseau: the first code of justice was arrived at through the recognition of ownership (II, 136) -- but this wasn’t necessarily a good thing (II, 137)
- Rousseau: slavery is absurd and meaningless (II, 139, 142)
- Mill: wifes should have the same rights as husbands (III, 83, 87)


- Socrates/Plato: democracy (as in unrestrained rule of majority) is worst form of government (I, 32, 35)
- Aristotle: the family is the basic unit of government (I, 95)
- Aristotle: democracy is a perversion of constitutional government (I, 99)
- Aristotle: in an ideal society, the middle class is predominant, with few rich or poor people (I, 100)
- Aristotle: a State’s purpose is to provide its people with food, arts, arms, revenue, religion, law and justice (I, 102)
- Aristotle: education should be public (I, 107)
- Lucretius: society originated when men got tired of living by brute force and exchanged a limitation on their actions for security (I, 153)
- Hobbes: government arises out of a social contract in which men enter in order to escape the brutish state of nature (II, 36, 42)
- Spinoza: since one man cannot assist every needy person, care of the poor should be the responsibility of society as a whole (II, 82, 86)
- Locke: the point of government is to protect the life, property, and well-being of its citizens (II, 111)
- Locke: “the end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom” (II, 112)
- Montesquieu: political authority ought to be divided into legislative, executive and judicial (II, 120)
- Montesquieu: democracies are threatened by both too much inequality and too much equality (II, 121, 124)
- Rousseau: the family represents the first model of a political society (II, 139)
- Rousseau: sovereign power cannot exceed the law (II, 140)
- Rousseau: “the social state is advantageous to men only when all have something and none too much” (II, 142)
- Hegel: international law must regulate interactions among states (III, 48)
- Mill: protection is needed against society’s tendency to suppress individuality (III, 81, 84)


- Socrates/Plato: possible through logical alone (deduction, rationalism: I, 37)
- Socrates/Plato: relativism is foolish (I, 38)
- Socrates/Plato: we understand things by dissecting them into their component parts (I, 39)
- Aristotle: men have a desire to know (I, 118)
- Aristotle: the world exists independently of our perception (I, 126)
- Lucretius: life is likely to exist on other worlds (I, 147)
- Lucretius: the soul perishes with out body (I, 147, 151)
- Lucretius: fantastic creatures never existed because they violate principles of logic (I, 148, 153)
- Lucretius: the world had a beginning and will have an end (I, 153)
- Lucretius: the power of religion comes from ignorance of how things are (I, 154)
- Plotinus: knowledge has to be able to determine action, or it is useless (I, 180)
- Bacon: learning tames the beast in man and defends against the temptations of idleness and pleasure ... Unlike other pleasures, knowledge cannot be sated (II, 24)
- Bacon: induction ought to replace deduction (Aristotle) in science (II, 29)
- Bacon: more widespread writing is crucial to the advancement of science (II, 31)
- Hobbes: true abd false are attributes of speech, not of things (II, 34, 38)
- Descartes: reading good books is like conversing with noble men of the past who offer their best thoughts (II, 49, 51)
- Descartes: the method to knowledge includes radical doubt, subdivision of problems in smaller parts that can be addressed separately (reductionism), and orderly proceeding from simple to complex issues (II, 52, 56-57)
- Spinoza: mathematics forces us to think logically, and thinking logically releases us from the web of superstition spun by pagan high priests (II, 67)
- Spinoza: the laws and rules of nature are everywhere and always the same (uniformitarianism) (II, 77)
- Locke: knowledge can be intuitive, rational (arrived at through rigorous logic), or a matter of judgment (probabilistic, based on evidence) (II, 105, 110)
- Berkeley: things perceived with our senses may be images of the mind, so we cannot be sure of the true nature of anything (II, 116, 118) -- however, this is meant to stress the limits of the human mind, not to question the reality of nature (II, 117, 118)
- Hume: two sources of information for the mind: ideas and sensory impressions (II, 128)
- Hume: all reasoning on matters of fact are based on the perceived relation of cause and effect (II, 130)
- Hume: no human testimony can ever prove a miracle (II, 131)
- Hume: just reasoning depends on moderate skepticism (II, 132)
- Kant: sensory impression gives us knowledge a posteriori; while intuition and reason give us knowledge a priori (III, 3)
- Kant: awareness of time and space are a priori (not from sensory perception), and constitute indispensable frames of reference to make sense of the world (III, 4, 6)
- Mill: no restriction should be put on what is written or published (III, 82, 86)
- James: reasoning requires breaking a subject into parts and selecting those that will most likely lead to a successful conclusion (III, 104, 109)
- James: we have other inborn untuitions other than space and time (see Kant), e.g., cold, heat, pleasure, pain, color, sound (III, 117, 118)

Posted by pking
Apr. 12, 2004